A Universal Moral Framework: Challenging Ethical Relativism Through the Biopsychosocial Model
Introduction
In his speech “Distorted Morality: America’s War on Terror?” delivered at Harvard University in February 2002, Noam Chomsky asserts, “The only ethics that everyone can agree on is survival.” This statement underscores a fundamental truth about human nature: at its core, human morality is deeply intertwined with the imperative for survival. Across cultures, societies, and even historical contexts, human beings are driven by the basic need to live, thrive, and cooperate. This intrinsic drive for survival, embedded in our biology, psychology, and social structures, offers a universal foundation for moral principles that transcend cultural relativism. Chomsky’s insight aligns closely with the biopsychosocial model—a framework that integrates biological, psychological, and social dimensions of human experience to propose universal moral principles grounded in human nature.
The biopsychosocial model, which integrates these diverse dimensions, challenges ethical relativism by proposing that while moral expressions may vary across cultures, there are fundamental moral principles that are universal and objective. These principles are embedded in our genetic predispositions, shared psychological mechanisms, and social imperatives for cooperation and collective well-being. This paper explores how the biopsychosocial model creates a universal moral framework that counters ethical relativism and aligns with Chomsky’s claim that survival is the most universally agreed-upon ethical principle.
Ethical Relativism and Its Challenge
Ethical relativism posits that moral values and principles are not universal but are subjective and culturally specific. According to this view, what is considered right or wrong depends entirely on the customs, values, and beliefs of individual societies, and there are no universal moral truths that apply to all cultures (Harman, 1975). This form of relativism suggests that moral judgments are based on social contexts and cannot be universally applied, as different societies have different moral standards based on their unique traditions, languages, and worldviews.
The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, which suggests that language shapes thought, often aligns with ethical relativism by claiming that language not only reflects but also influences cognitive processes. According to this perspective, because different cultures use different languages and linguistic structures, they also develop distinct ways of perceiving and categorizing reality, including moral concepts (Whorf, 1956).
However, this perspective is challenged by the biopsychosocial model, which argues that human morality is not purely culturally constructed but rather rooted in universal biological and psychological processes that transcend linguistic and cultural boundaries. The biopsychosocial model suggests that while cultural norms may shape the expression of moral values, the underlying principles of cooperation, fairness, and empathy are universal and biologically ingrained in all human beings, regardless of their linguistic or cultural differences.
The Biopsychosocial Model and Universal Moral Principles
Biological Foundations of Morality
From a biological perspective, the biopsychosocial model asserts that moral behavior is rooted in genetic predispositions and neural mechanisms that are shared by all humans. Humans are biologically wired to experience empathy, cooperation, and altruism, which are essential for social bonding and group survival. Research has shown that the mirror neuron system plays a key role in our ability to empathize with others and recognize their emotional states, suggesting that these biological mechanisms underlie universal moral emotions like compassion and guilt (Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia, 2008). These neural mechanisms are common across cultures, reinforcing the idea that basic moral principles—such as non-harm, fairness, and justice—are biologically embedded in human nature, making them universal rather than culturally specific.
Moreover, evolutionary biology supports the notion that cooperation and altruism are adaptive traits that have been selected for in human populations due to their importance for group survival. The tendency to act in ways that benefit others, particularly within social groups, is a fundamental part of human nature that transcends cultural or linguistic barriers. This biological basis for moral behavior provides a universal foundation for ethics, grounded in the imperative of survival and cooperative living.
Psychological Universals in Moral Reasoning
Psychologically, the biopsychosocial model posits that universal emotional responses—such as empathy, guilt, and shame—drive moral decision-making. These emotional reactions to the suffering of others and the violation of social norms are common across cultures and reflect a shared psychological framework for understanding and responding to moral dilemmas.
Moral emotions such as empathy and guilt are deeply ingrained in our cognitive development. These emotions guide individuals to act in ways that promote social harmony and group well-being, providing a psychological foundation for universal moral principles. For example, research shows that humans are universally motivated to punish wrongdoers and reward cooperative behaviors, which are core aspects of justice and fairness (Toby, 2009). These psychological mechanisms, rooted in human emotional regulation, support the notion of a universal moral code that promotes justice, equality, and non-harm across diverse societies.
Social and Cultural Dimensions
While the biological and psychological aspects of morality form the foundation of universal moral principles, the social dimension of the biopsychosocial model underscores that human societies rely on certain social structures to promote cooperation and ensure the survival of the community. Across cultures, societies establish laws and norms that regulate behavior, promote social justice, and protect vulnerable members of the community. These social structures are based on the universal moral principles of cooperation, justice, and respect for others’ rights.
Regardless of culture or language, every society develops a system of justice that addresses the needs of the collective, promoting equity, safety, and peace. The biopsychosocial model posits that these social norms are not arbitrary but are grounded in universal moral principles that are essential for the survival and well-being of both individuals and communities.
Aligning with Noam Chomsky: The Universal Ethics of Survival
Chomsky’s assertion that “the only ethics that everyone can agree on is survival” resonates deeply with the biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes that survival is the primary and universal ethical principle that guides all human behavior. The biological, psychological, and social imperatives for survival are shared across all cultures, providing a universal moral framework rooted in the survival of the group and the well-being of individuals within it.
As Chomsky points out, survival is the ethics that unites humanity, even when other ethical principles may diverge based on cultural, religious, or individual beliefs. The biopsychosocial model aligns with this by asserting that moral reasoning and ethical decision-making are deeply influenced by biological instincts for cooperation, psychological mechanisms such as empathy and guilt, and social structures that promote collective well-being.
Creating a Universal Moral Principle
Drawing from the biological, psychological, and social dimensions of human experience, the biopsychosocial model proposes a universal moral principle:
“The principle of collective well-being and mutual respect.”
This principle arises from the biological need for cooperation, the psychological experience of empathy, and the social imperative for stability and harmony. It asserts that human beings, by virtue of their biology, psychology, and social contexts, share the capacity to act in ways that ensure mutual survival and well-being. This universal moral principle calls for non-harm, fairness, justice, and compassion, as these ethical standards ensure the survival and flourishing of both individuals and communities.
Conclusion
The biopsychosocial model challenges ethical relativism by proposing that while the expression of moral values may vary across cultures, the core moral principles—such as justice, empathy, and cooperation—are universal. These principles, rooted in our biological nature, psychological experiences, and social imperatives, provide a universal foundation for ethics. In this sense, the biopsychosocial model supports Noam Chomsky’s assertion that the one universal ethical principle everyone can agree upon is survival. The biopsychosocial framework offers a moral foundation that is valid, sound, and universally applicable, promoting justice, equality, and collective well-being across diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.
References
Chomsky, N. (1999). The Common Good. Odonian Press.
Chomsky, Noam. Distorted Morality: America’s War on Terror? Delivered at Harvard University, February 2002. Available at: https://chomsky.info/200202__02/.
Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Harcourt.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011). Who’s in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. HarperCollins.
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Pantheon Books
Harman, G. (1975). Moral relativism and moral objectivity. Journal of Philosophy, 72(9), 611–628.
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language. In A. F. S. (Ed.), The Neuroscience of Social Interaction (pp. 13-35). Oxford University Press.
Toby, G. (2009). Moral emotions and social behavior: Empathy and its role in conflict resolution. Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 42-56.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
My biopsychosocial model presents a compelling challenge to the idea of ethical relativism, which claims that there is no universal moral standard and that ethics are entirely dependent on cultural, societal, or individual perspectives. This model, integrating biological, psychological, and social dimensions, suggests that there are universal principles of morality that transcend cultural or subjective differences, grounded in human nature, shared human experiences, and natural laws.
Challenging Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism argues that moral principles are culturally bound, meaning that each culture develops its own ethical system based on historical, social, and linguistic contexts, and therefore, no culture’s ethical system is superior to another. The biopsychosocial model, however, provides a counter-argument by asserting that human morality is deeply embedded in our biology, psychology, and social structures, creating a foundation for universal moral principles.
1. Biological Universals: From a biological perspective, humans share a common genetic inheritance and neurological framework that shape our capacity for empathy, cooperation, and moral reasoning. These biological traits suggest that basic ethical principles, such as non-violence, fairness, and compassion, are ingrained in human nature and likely universal across cultures, regardless of linguistic or social differences. This universality of basic ethics challenges the relativist view that there are no objective moral standards, because it posits that humans have an innate capacity to recognize and practice certain ethical behaviors for survival and cooperation.
2. Psychological Universals: Psychologically, the model emphasizes that humans across cultures develop similar emotional responses to suffering, harm, and justice. Regardless of cultural context, there are shared experiences of empathy and guilt, which guide moral behavior. These psychological mechanisms, rooted in both our neural architecture and individual development, point to the existence of certain universal moral principles—for example, the Golden Rule (“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”) is recognized across diverse cultural traditions. The universality of these psychological mechanisms undermines the relativist view that ethics are merely subjective or culturally constructed.
3. Social Universals: Socially, the biopsychosocial model asserts that while each culture may have different expressions of morality, they all rely on certain social structures to maintain cohesion, order, and collective well-being. Principles such as justice, equality, and social trust are foundational to human societies, and while their exact interpretations may differ, their existence in all societies points to an underlying universal standard of moral behavior.
Together, these biological, psychological, and social elements suggest that ethics, while culturally shaped, are not completely relative. There are universal principles grounded in human nature that provide a foundation for moral objectivity—challenging the claim that ethical relativism is the only valid stance.
Aligning with Noam Chomsky: Ethics and Survival
Noam Chomsky, in his speeches, has argued that the one universally agreed-upon ethical principle is survival—that, regardless of culture or belief, human beings instinctively value life, both their own and that of others. In the context of my biopsychosocial model, this principle aligns with the biological and psychological foundations of human morality.
1. Biological Imperative for Survival: The biological aspect of my model demonstrates that all humans are driven by survival instincts. The fight-or-flight response, as well as mechanisms of cooperation and social bonding, evolved to ensure group survival and individual well-being. These instincts guide moral decision-making in ways that promote life-preserving behaviors—such as empathy, compassion, and cooperation—as humans rely on social bonds for collective survival. This supports Chomsky’s claim that survival is a universal ethical principle embedded in human nature.
2. Psychological and Social Imperatives: Psychologically, humans are wired to avoid harm and seek protection for themselves and their communities. The sense of guilt and shame when inflicting harm or violating others’ rights speaks to a psychological aversion to behaviors that threaten survival. The biopsychosocial model thus reinforces the idea that our moral reasoning is rooted in our shared survival instincts, aligning with Chomsky’s assertion that survival is the only ethical principle that is universally agreed upon.
Creating a Universal Moral Principle
My biopsychosocial model can help define a universal moral principle that is both valid and sound, grounded in the shared biological, psychological, and social experiences of all human beings. The universal moral principle can be articulated as follows:
**The principle of collective well-being and mutual respect: Morality arises from the biological need for cooperation, the psychological experience of empathy, and the social need for stability and harmony. Human beings have an innate capacity to recognize that mutual cooperation and respect for the rights of others are essential for the survival and flourishing of both individuals and communities. This principle calls for non-harm, fairness, justice, and empathy, as these ethical standards ensure the collective survival of human beings in a complex, interconnected world.
Why This Principle is Valid:
Biological Validation: Our genetic predispositions and neural systems are designed to support survival through empathy, cooperation, and social bonding. These biological factors provide the foundation for universally shared moral instincts.
Psychological Validation: The human experience of empathy, guilt, and moral reasoning across cultures demonstrates that these principles resonate universally, even when expressed differently across societies.
Social Validation: All human societies, regardless of culture, require certain social structures for cohesion and well-being, such as justice systems, resource sharing, and care for the vulnerable. These systems are essential for collective survival.
Why This Principle is Sound:
The principle is sound because it is rooted in human nature—biological instincts and psychological needs for survival and cooperation. Moreover, the principle has been historically validated by its manifestation in virtually every society, whether it is expressed in religious teachings, legal systems, or cultural norms.
Conclusion
The biopsychosocial model challenges ethical relativism by asserting that while culture may influence the expression of moral values, there exist universal moral principles grounded in biological instincts, psychological experiences, and social necessities. These universal principles are not arbitrary but are rooted in the shared need for survival and collective well-being, aligning with Noam Chomsky’s assertion that survival is the one universal ethical principle.
In this way, the biopsychosocial model offers a universal, objective moral framework—one that is valid, based on human nature, and sound, as it is evidenced across biological, psychological, and social dimensions of human existence. This framework establishes a moral foundation that transcends cultural differences, providing a guiding principle that can be applied universally to promote justice, empathy, and collective survival.
Spirolateral 