The Problem:
A person contacts me and says:
“I keep ending up in relationships where I chase, and the other person pulls away. Or I withdraw when someone gets too close. It’s exhausting, but I don’t know how to stop this cycle.”
Step 1: Diagnosing the Systemic Dysfunction
🔍 What’s Happening?
This is a dysregulated relational feedback loop where one person seeks connection (anxious attachment) while the other seeks distance (avoidant attachment). The more one pursues, the more the other withdraws, reinforcing fear-based survival mechanisms instead of co-regulated connection.
🔹 Key Systemic Issues:
✔ Misaligned nervous system regulation – One person uses proximity for safety, while the other uses distance to self-regulate.
✔ Hierarchical emotional control – The relationship dynamic functions as a dominance-submission cycle, where one person controls through pursuit and the other controls through withdrawal.
✔ Lack of recursive self-adjusting feedback – The system does not course-correct; instead, it escalates to extremes (closeness vs. avoidance).
Step 2: Replacing Dysfunction with Adaptive Self-Regulation
🚀 FCP-Based Solution: Instead of treating attachment patterns as fixed traits, we redesign the relational system so both partners feel safe without needing to overcompensate.
🔹 Self-Correcting Relationship Structure:
✔ Stop Chasing & Avoiding → Shift to Mutual Calibration
→ Create a reciprocal loop where both partners actively adjust based on emotional bandwidth rather than reacting from survival mode.
✔ Replace Closeness-Distance Polarity with Self-Regulating Connection Zones
→ Instead of an “all-or-nothing” chase dynamic, introduce gradual attunement cycles where intimacy adjusts naturally.
✔ Neutralize Emotional Power Struggles
→ The anxious partner learns to co-regulate internally instead of externalizing safety, and the avoidant partner learns to experience connection without overwhelm.
Step 3: Long-Term Relationship Stability Plan
🔹 Practical FCP-Based Adjustments:
✔ Redefine Pursuit as Shared Attunement → Shift from “Who’s pulling away?” to “What’s our natural rhythm of connection?”
✔ Introduce Micro-Doses of Emotional Exposure → The avoidant partner stretches their capacity for connection in safe increments, and the anxious partner practices self-regulation instead of relying on proximity for safety.
✔ Embed a Self-Regulating Relationship Structure → Instead of chasing or running, both partners identify and adjust their own regulation states, creating a dynamic, resilient connection.
Outcome: A Relationship That Regulates Itself Instead of Collapsing into Chaos
FCP shifts the relationship from:
❌ A rigid pursue-withdraw cycle
❌ Emotional dependency or hyper-independence
❌ High-stakes survival-driven attachment
To:
✅ A fluid, adaptive emotional ecosystem
✅ A relational system where both partners feel safe & connected
✅ A self-correcting dynamic where intimacy builds naturally
Bottom Line: FCP Eliminates the Chase by Redesigning the Attachment System Itself
🚀 No more running. No more chasing. Just a relationship that balances itself naturally.
🔹 Want to break free from this cycle? Let’s redesign your relational patterns today.
How I Use Functional Conflict Perspective (FCP) to Resolve Anxious-Avoidant Dynamics
Rather than focusing on surface-level behavior, FCP targets the structural mechanics that create the run-chase dynamic, replacing dysregulation with self-adjusting relational flow.
🔹 Step 1: Systemic Mapping – Understanding the Core Issue
Before implementing change, I diagnose the structural dysfunction by mapping:
✔ Feedback Loops → How does the relationship regulate itself? (Or does it escalate conflict instead?)
✔ Polarization Points → What triggers the chase vs. withdrawal dynamic?
✔ Self-Regulation Deficits → How do each partner’s nervous systems attempt to stabilize?
Example Diagnosis Map:
1️⃣ The anxious partner depends on external regulation (closeness) for safety.
2️⃣ The avoidant partner depends on distance (internal regulation) to maintain safety.
3️⃣ Their opposing regulation strategies amplify each other → The more one pursues, the more the other withdraws.
💡 Core Problem: Their system lacks a shared, adaptive feedback loop—instead, they create a cycle of overcompensation (one moves closer, the other moves away).
🔹 Step 2: Implementing a Self-Regulating Relational Framework
I replace their reactive patterns with a dynamic structure that naturally self-adjusts.
🔄 Intervention: Creating a Recursive Adjustment Loop
Instead of:
❌ One person chasing, the other running → The system collapses into instability.
I install:
✅ A feedback loop that continuously self-adjusts → The system naturally adapts to changes in emotional need without extremes.
🔧 How I Build This Feedback System
🔹 Micro-Dosing Connection & Distance → I create gradual exposure so the avoidant partner doesn’t feel overwhelmed, and the anxious partner doesn’t feel abandoned.
🔹 Emotional Temperature Checkpoints → Instead of forcing closeness or space, I implement checkpoints where both partners pause, recalibrate, and co-regulate.
🔹 Layered Communication Patterns → I reframe conversations so that instead of emotional escalation leading to shutdown, partners adjust in real-time before distress peaks.
🔹 Step 3: Building a Long-Term Sustainable Relationship Structure
Once self-adjusting feedback loops are in place, I ensure the relationship maintains long-term stability through:
✔ Mutual Regulation Anchors → Teaching partners how to co-regulate in manageable doses rather than defaulting to over-connection or extreme withdrawal.
✔ Shifting from Survival Mode to Adaptive Trust → Replacing emotional reactivity with shared calibration → intimacy becomes something that adapts naturally rather than being forced or avoided.
✔ Ensuring Continuous Self-Regulation Updates → The system self-adjusts without intervention—each partner learns to modulate closeness and space intuitively.
🚀 Outcome: A Relationship That Stabilizes Itself Instead of Collapsing
❌ BEFORE: Chasing & running in a reactive loop.
✅ AFTER: A dynamic relational structure that naturally adjusts to needs without triggering survival responses.
This isn’t just “relationship advice.” It’s a full system redesign that ensures:
✔ Emotional safety for both partners.
✔ Sustainable intimacy without overcorrection.
✔ A relational structure that prevents future instability.
💡 Want to implement this in your relationship? Let’s build your self-regulating connection system today.
Resolving Explosive Emotional Reactions & Avoidant Shutdowns with Functional Conflict Perspective (FCP)
“A partner keeps having explosive emotional reactions when her fear of being abandoned and rejected leads her to reject others instead. She isn’t aware that she needs her partner to be closer to her so she can’t find the words to ask, and is angry and projecting her unmet need because her mind isn’t being read. Her avoidant partner is not very in touch with his emotions, which means he is confused and defensive when she gets upset, he doesn’t’t know how to hold space for her emotions, and when he pulls away she becomes verbally abusive. He stonewalls her, and goes no contact.”
This relationship is structurally unstable because it lacks a shared regulation framework. Instead of functioning as a cohesive system, both partners are operating in survival mode, triggering self-protective behaviors that reinforce disconnection.
🔹 Step 1: Diagnosing the Structural Dysfunction
What’s Happening?
🔴 Anxious Partner’s Core Issue:
Unconscious Need: She needs emotional reassurance and connection but doesn’t recognize it.
Protective Mechanism: Instead of asking for closeness, she rejects first to avoid being abandoned.
Conflict Behavior: Explosive emotional reactions, verbal attacks, projection, and accusations.
🔵 Avoidant Partner’s Core Issue:
Unconscious Need: He needs emotional stability and low reactivity to feel safe in connection.
Protective Mechanism: Instead of addressing emotional intensity, he disconnects completely.
Conflict Behavior: Stonewalling, emotional shutdown, and eventually no contact.
💡 Systemic Breakdown:
✔ The anxious partner demands closeness aggressively → triggering avoidant withdrawal.
✔ The avoidant partner pulls away → reinforcing the anxious partner’s fear of abandonment.
✔ Both partners are trapped in a feedback loop of escalating distress → instead of repairing, they create more relational damage.
🔹 Step 2: Implementing a Self-Regulating Relational System
Instead of forcing them to change personalities, I implement structural adjustments that naturally shift their relational dynamics.
🔄 Intervention: Installing a Real-Time Calibration Loop
✅ STOPPING THE ESCALATION CYCLE:
I teach the anxious partner to recognize emotional activation early and pause before escalation.
I teach the avoidant partner how to stay present without shutting down by using structured emotional engagement techniques (instead of passive withdrawal).
✅ SHIFTING FROM DEMAND-REJECT TO MUTUAL ATTUNEMENT:
The anxious partner learns to verbalize needs in low-intensity moments instead of waiting until the fear is overwhelming.
The avoidant partner practices micro-doses of emotional engagement so he doesn’t feel trapped or overwhelmed.
✅ CREATING A SHARED REGULATION SYSTEM:
Instead of expecting instant emotional attunement, I install a transitional regulation method that helps both partners adjust in small, manageable shifts.
We remove “mind-reading expectations” → replacing them with a self-correcting communication framework where each partner actively updates their emotional state to prevent projection and misalignment.
🔹 Step 3: Long-Term Relational Stability Plan
✔ Relational Rewiring: The anxious partner learns to ask for closeness in real-time, and the avoidant partner learns how to stay connected without emotional overload.
✔ Structural Balance: Their relational system naturally prevents extreme reactions, reducing emotional explosions and stonewalling shutdowns.
✔ Self-Regulating Emotional System: Instead of escalation leading to disconnection, their relationship develops built-in repair mechanisms that ensure emotional safety for both partners.
🚀 Outcome: A Relationship That Stabilizes Instead of Collapsing
❌ BEFORE:
Explosive anger and rejection cycles lead to emotional shutdown and stonewalling.
Partners operate in survival mode, reinforcing self-protective behavior instead of co-regulation.
✅ AFTER:
A relational structure that catches emotional distress early and adjusts before it escalates.
A self-correcting communication system where both partners actively signal and respond without overreaction.
💡 Want to transform this dynamic? Let’s build a self-regulating connection system today.
Detailed Breakdown: Repairing the Anxious-Avoidant Dynamic & Reducing Emotional Reactivity
Using Functional Conflict Perspective (FCP), I restructure the emotional regulation system within the relationship so that:
1️⃣ The anxious partner learns how to request connection without escalating.
2️⃣ The avoidant partner learns how to stay present without feeling overwhelmed.
This approach does not force either partner to change their core traits—instead, it reconfigures their interaction system so that their differences create balance rather than conflict.
🔹 Part 1: How to Teach the Anxious Partner to Be Less Reactive
Step 1: Recognizing Activation Before It Escalates
Before addressing behavioral reactions, I teach the anxious partner how to track the early warning signs of emotional activation.
🔹 What happens in the body first? (Rapid heart rate, feeling on edge, an urge to send a long text or make accusations)
🔹 What thought loops start? (Catastrophizing, assuming abandonment, over-analyzing partner’s tone)
🔹 How does the body respond? (Impulse to demand attention, lash out, or reject first before being rejected)
💡 Goal: Identify these triggers early enough to disrupt the automatic response before escalation.
Step 2: Creating a Self-Regulating Pause
Once activation is recognized, the anxious partner interrupts the default impulse (reactivity) and replaces it with a regulation action:
✅ Replace chasing or lashing out with grounding → Instead of immediate engagement, the anxious partner practices a 90-second pause before reacting.
✅ Use a sensory cue to disrupt emotional flooding → (Splashing cold water, standing up, stepping outside for fresh air, engaging in deep breathing).
✅ Mentally reframe the situation → Instead of assuming, “If I don’t get reassurance now, I’m being abandoned,” shift to “I need connection, and I will ask for it clearly.”
💡 Goal: Train the nervous system to tolerate short moments of discomfort without rushing to demand external reassurance.
Step 3: Learning to Request Connection Without Panic
The biggest shift for the anxious partner is learning how to directly request connection rather than expecting their partner to read their distress signals.
🔹 Instead of saying, “You never care about me! Why do you always ignore me?”
🔹 Shift to, “I’m feeling disconnected right now, can we reconnect?”
✅ Speak in low-intensity moments, not peak distress.
✅ Use clear, need-based statements instead of accusations.
✅ Make connection a collaborative request, not a demand.
💡 Goal: Teach the anxious partner how to verbally ask for connection before panic sets in rather than waiting until distress takes over.
Step 4: Practicing Low-Stakes Emotional Exposure
Since the anxious partner’s biggest fear is rejection, I train them to gradually experience small moments of uncertainty without reacting impulsively.
🔹 Micro-Exposure Exercises:
✅ Text their partner and wait for a reply without checking constantly.
✅ Sit with mild discomfort when a response is delayed instead of assuming abandonment.
✅ Remind themselves: Emotional regulation can come from within, not just external validation.
💡 Goal: Increase the anxious partner’s capacity for self-regulation, so they aren’t completely dependent on their partner’s immediate response for stability.
Final Outcome for the Anxious Partner
Instead of:
❌ Explosive accusations and panic-driven conflict cycles.
❌ Expecting their partner to “just know” what they need.
❌ Feeling abandoned and rejected without clear communication tools.
They now:
✅ Recognize emotional activation early and apply regulation tools before escalating.
✅ Clearly verbalize needs for connection without resorting to verbal attacks or passive-aggressiveness.
✅ Tolerate short moments of uncertainty without automatically assuming abandonment.
🔹 Part 2: How to Teach the Avoidant Partner to Stay Present Without Overwhelm
Since avoidant partners feel emotionally overloaded when their partner is distressed, I focus on training them to stay connected in small, manageable ways.
Step 1: Teaching the Avoidant Partner How to Identify Emotional Shutdown
🔹 What happens in their body first? (Tension in the chest, an urge to escape, shutting down emotionally)
🔹 What thought loops start? (Feeling trapped, pressured, afraid they will be consumed by emotions)
🔹 What behavioral responses follow? (Stonewalling, avoiding conversations, going no contact)
💡 Goal: Train the avoidant partner to recognize avoidance behaviors as self-protection, not logical solutions.
Step 2: Micro-Doses of Emotional Engagement
Instead of expecting instant emotional attunement, I introduce low-effort, high-impact ways for the avoidant partner to stay engaged without feeling overwhelmed.
✅ 5-minute emotional check-ins → Rather than long, draining emotional talks, the avoidant partner learns to engage in small bursts that feel safe.
✅ Using words instead of disappearing → Instead of stonewalling, I train them to say “I need a moment, but I will check in later.”
✅ Pausing before shutting down → Before instinctively withdrawing, they learn to verbalize their reaction instead of going silent.
💡 Goal: Ensure the avoidant partner stays present in a way that doesn’t trigger emotional exhaustion.
Step 3: Building Safe Emotional Boundaries Without Disconnection
🔹 The avoidant partner learns that staying emotionally available does not mean losing autonomy.
🔹 Instead of viewing connection as suffocating, they reframe it as co-regulation.
✅ Set structured time for emotional engagement → “I can talk about this for 20 minutes, and then I’ll need a break.”
✅ Use emotional self-checks → “How much emotional capacity do I have right now?”
✅ Develop alternative ways to engage → Some avoidant partners do better with written communication or activities instead of face-to-face emotional intensity.
💡 Goal: Remove the “all-or-nothing” emotional expectation → They learn how to stay connected in sustainable ways.
Final Outcome for the Avoidant Partner
Instead of:
❌ Emotionally shutting down and avoiding hard conversations.
❌ Stonewalling and disappearing to escape pressure.
❌ Feeling overwhelmed by their partner’s emotional needs.
They now:
✅ Stay present in the relationship without feeling drained.
✅ Use verbal engagement instead of avoidance.
✅ Learn to co-regulate without losing autonomy.
🔹 Final Relationship Outcome: A Self-Regulating Attachment System
Instead of:
❌ The anxious partner reacting impulsively and expecting their needs to be guessed.
❌ The avoidant partner withdrawing completely and refusing to engage.
✅ The anxious partner learns to verbalize needs instead of reacting explosively.
✅ The avoidant partner learns to stay engaged without emotional shutdown.
✅ The relationship stabilizes through self-correcting feedback loops instead of collapsing into survival mode.
🚀 Ready to Repair Your Attachment Dynamics?
💡 Using Functional Conflict Perspective, I help couples install a self-regulating system that keeps their connection stable—without forcing personality changes.
📩 Book a consultation today to transform your relationship.
Spirolateral 